Monday, January 10, 2011

Causality and Correspondence

The framework of his order of the entire science and science. Nothing more and nothing less. That is the principle of causality.
When Newton saw an apple fall, it is said, he thinks there must be something that embodies the fall of an apple. This was the one who necessitates the existence of gravity in physics. When Mendell see the regularity of nature - the nature of heredity, he thinks there must be something that embody the regularity of nature - the nature of heredity. Confidence is growing theory of genetics.
Causality principle reads,

"Everything needs because to him - there, except existence itself." The first important property of causality is harmony: that is one reason that the same will produce the same result. In addition it is the nature kesemasaan cause and effect, and the existential nature of the relation between cause and effect.

The principle of causality is the fundamental law of nature. Because without accepting the principle of causality as a basic law of nature, which is one of the very properties of being, it is impossible to single any law necessitates a general nature for nature.

And he is not the result of "correspondence" or "link-relations" conducted by people on the basis of experience inderawinya ratio, as it is said by some people. Because even all sensory experiences lose its meaning, even the whole material universe could not exist without ditahkik accept the principle of causality beforehand.

And how can some people it describes the case - corresponding things over and over - again but not believed to have a causal relationship. For example, night came after lunch and after lunch came the night. Why did no one think that the day was the cause tonight is the cause of day and night?

So, must be accepted into - objectively - the principle of causality, and believes that this principle is not just psychological principles. So with the eyes of causality must necessarily accepted the existence of the cause of all this material universe, which certainly is not the nature of matter itself, or part of it, because the material is not necessarily always require the existence of that reason for being. Really this is a bright evidence of the existence of immaterial nature, which some people call it the spiritual nature or natural intelligebles. As physicists believe in the existence of electrons? Or lighter again?

No comments:

Post a Comment